What is strategic about disinvestment?
30 Jan 2021
2 Min Read
Editorial Team
It worries him when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors� for the newly cleared disinvestment policy, Pratap Padode says.
_____________
The top (See Table 1) made an aggregate net profit of Rs 1.8 trillion during 2018-19. The other 168 profit-making PSEs made an aggregate total net profit of Rs 66.64 billion. So, 62% of the profits came from just 10 PSEs from the 178 profit making enterprises.
No surprises there to also learn that all 10 of them are from the energy sector). Of the 70 loss-making PSEs, (See Table 2). The balance 60 contributed a loss of Rs 1.89 billion.
Total investment in the PSEs contributed during 2018-19 was Rs 2.09 trillion. It is amply clear that mining and exploration businesses or the energy related businesses gave a return of 19.98% while the aggregate return from all sectors was 12.11% during 2018-19.
The disinvestment policy that received clearance recently has identified a list of strategic sectors requiring presence of PSEs in public interest where at least one enterprise will remain in the public sector, but private sector will also be allowed. (See Table 3).
Given the market conditions, with BSE volumes touching trades equivalent to $2.7 trillion and Sensex swinging around kissing distance of 50,000 while it tottered at 29,468 last year during March 2020, divestment needs to take a more proactive role in shoring finances for COVD hit fiscal deficit.
Around 2003, during the Economic Editors� conference I asked the then Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, “If the job of the Government is to provide an enabling environment for business and commerce to flourish and not be in the business of business, how does the decision of holding onto ITDC Hotels make sense for the government?� Sinha was a tad annoyed and retorted that the government can remain in businesses that it can contribute to. Since then, ITDC has been shedding hotels and its divestment plan now is in a firmer position.
So, when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors�, I am worried.
Also read: BPCL divestment bidding to become competitive
Author: Pratap Padode is Editor-in-Chief, & Founder,.
____________________________________________
4th Indian Cement Review Conference 2021
17-18 March
Make in Steel 2021
24 February
It worries him when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors� for the newly cleared disinvestment policy, Pratap Padode says.
_____________The top 10 profit-making public-sector enterprises (PSEs) (See Table 1) made an aggregate net profit of Rs 1.8 trillion during 2018-19. The other 168 profit-making PSEs made an aggregate total net profit of Rs 66.64 billion. So, 62% of the profits came from just 10 PSEs from the 178 profit making enterprises.
No surprises there to also learn that all 10 of them are from the energy sector). Of the 70 loss-making PSEs, just 10 of them contributed 94% of the total losses of Rs 31.64 billion (See Table 2). The balance 60 contributed a loss of Rs 1.89 billion.
Total investment in the PSEs contributed during 2018-19 was Rs 2.09 trillion. It is amply clear that mining and exploration businesses or the energy related businesses gave a return of 19.98% while the aggregate return from all sectors was 12.11% during 2018-19.
The disinvestment policy that received clearance recently has identified a list of strategic sectors requiring presence of PSEs in public interest where at least one enterprise will remain in the public sector, but private sector will also be allowed. The disinvestment targets for the current year 2020-21 seem to be way off the realisation (See Table 3).
Given the market conditions, with BSE volumes touching trades equivalent to $2.7 trillion and Sensex swinging around kissing distance of 50,000 while it tottered at 29,468 last year during March 2020, divestment needs to take a more proactive role in shoring finances for COVD hit fiscal deficit.
Around 2003, during the Economic Editors� conference I asked the then Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, “If the job of the Government is to provide an enabling environment for business and commerce to flourish and not be in the business of business, how does the decision of holding onto ITDC Hotels make sense for the government?� Sinha was a tad annoyed and retorted that the government can remain in businesses that it can contribute to. Since then, ITDC has been shedding hotels and its divestment plan now is in a firmer position.
So, when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors�, I am worried.Image sourceAlso read: BPCL divestment bidding to become competitiveRead more hereAuthor: Pratap Padode is Editor-in-Chief, Construction World, & Founder, FIRST Construction Council.____________________________________________4th Indian Cement Review Conference 202117-18 March Click for event infoMake in Steel 202124 February Click for event info
Next Story
Reliance, Diehl Advance Pact for Precision-Guided Munitions
Diehl Defence CEO Helmut Rauch and Reliance Group’s Founder Chairman Anil D. Ambani have held discussions to advance their ongoing strategic partnership focused on Guided and Terminally Guided Munitions (TGM), under a cooperation agreement originally signed in 2019.This collaboration underscores Diehl Defence’s long-term commitment to the Indian market and its support for the Indian Government’s Make in India initiative. The partnership’s current emphasis is on the urgent supply of the Vulcano 155mm Precision Guided Munition system to the Indian Armed Forces.Simultaneously, the “Vulc..
Next Story
Modis Navnirman to Migrate to Main Board, Merge Subsidiary
Modis Navnirman Limited has announced that its Board of Directors has approved a key strategic initiative involving migration from the BSE SME platform to the Main Board of both BSE and NSE, alongside a merger with its wholly owned subsidiary, Shree Modis Navnirman Private Limited.The move to the main boards marks a major milestone in the company’s growth trajectory, reflecting its consistent financial performance, robust corporate governance, and long-term commitment to value creation. This transition will grant the company access to a broader investor base, improve market participation, en..
Next Story
Global Capital Flows Remain Subdued, EMEA Leads in Q1 2025
The Bharat InvITs Association’s industry update for Q1 2025 shows subdued global capital flows, with investment volumes remaining at the lower end of the five-year range despite a late 2024 recovery. According to data from Colliers and MSCI Real Capital Analytics, activity in North America declined slightly, while EMEA maintained steady levels and emerged as the top region for investment in standing assets.The EMEA region now hosts seven of the top ten cross-border capital destinations for standing assets, pushing the United States� share of global activity below 15 per cent. Meanwhile, in..