亚博体育官网首页

ICRA: Time for a Hybrid Toll Model in road sector
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

ICRA: Time for a Hybrid Toll Model in road sector

There has been a lot of debate in recent times about the need for the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to focus on asset monetisation and tap alternate funding avenues viz. toll-operate-transfer (TOT) and infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs) given the huge funding requirement for the ongoing Bharatmala Pariyojana programme. ICRA, in its earlier observation on this subject, has already highlighted the importance of speeding up the TOT awards and other fund-raising initiatives to meet the large funding requirements of the ambitious programme. However, the progress on both these fronts has been slow till date. To add to this, the share of the build-operate-transfer (BOT) (Toll) projects in the overall awards has declined sharply (being made primarily through the EPC/hybrid annuity mode); thereby increasing the financial burden on the NHAI. To overcome this, the NHAI may revert to the BOT (Toll) mode of project awarding. According to ICRA, the risk-sharing is not balanced enough, giving rise to the need to devise a new one.

Elaborating on why BOT (Toll) model may not have many takers in its current form, Mr. Rajeshwar Burla, VP & Associate Head, Corporate Ratings, ICRA said, 鈥淩isk averseness of road developers has increased over the last few years. Even today, many developers鈥� balance sheets cannot support huge equity investments towards BOT projects. Further, the transportation sector is undergoing transformational change with alternate modes viz. dedicated freight corridor and inland waterways which would result in a modal shift from road to these modes over the medium to long term. In addition, the road network itself is undergoing significant changes with some of the economic corridors under Bharatmala competing with few existing stretches. Overall, these factors would make the traffic forecasting extremely challenging. Therefore, BOT (Toll) model in its current form may not have many takers. Achieving financial closure also would be a challenge given these uncertainties.鈥�

In the past, what made NHAI shift away from BOT (Toll) to BOT (HAM)? With stressed balance sheets many developers shied away from BOT (Toll) projects. Until FY2014, the mode of project award was determined based on the waterfall mechanism that explored BOT (Toll) first followed by BOT (HAM) and then EPC depending on the traffic density along the project stretch. This process slowed down the awards due to weak private sector participation. Thus, in the absence of private sector participation, shifting to EPC mode and restarting the award process was time consuming which was primary reason for low awards in FY2013 and FY2014. This process was subsequently scrapped, the committee headed by Secretary of Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) now decides on the mode (BOT/EPC) of project awards. One of the reasons why BOT (HAM) was successful in attracting private sector participation was due to low upfront equity requirements when compared to conventional BOT projects.

On increasing financial burden for NHAI, compliance to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR) has led to increase in compensation by four times the market value in rural areas and twice the market value in urban areas. This in turn has led to a steep increase in land acquisition cost to upwards of Rs. 2.50 crore per hectare currently (as against Rs. 0.90 crore per hectare in FY2014). Land acquisition cost alone accounts for more than 30% of the total expenses of NHAI. Further, with around 90-92% of the awards over last few years through engineering procurement and construction (EPC, wherein NHAI has to fund 100% upfront) and BOT (HAM, wherein NHAI has to fund 40% upfront and remaining 60% over a period of 15 years) modes, the financial burden on NHAI has continued to remain high. The total debt for NHAI has increased by more than 2.4 times to Rs.1.79 lakh crore as on March 31, 2019 from Rs. 75,385 crore as on March 31, 2017.
In this context, NHAI is left with two options 鈥� a) to go slow on project awards or b) increase the mix of BOT (Toll) awards. Given the ambitious targets of Bharatmala programme, NHAI will be required to increase the mix of BOT (Toll) awards.

Mr. Burla added, 鈥淭he risk sharing is not balanced in the current BOT (Toll) model. Therefore, it is time to devise a new model on the lines of BOT (HAM) to reduce the upfront equity contribution for private developers to an extent. Also, the new model should have provision to re-negotiate contracts to protect the returns of developers in case of lower-than-anticipated traffic performance especially given the challenges in traffic forecasting currently on account of likely shift to other competing modes.鈥�

On NH awards and execution, awards were at a five-year low in FY2019 at 5,493 km (68% lower than 17,055 km awarded in FY2018) as against the target of 20,000 km for MoRTH. This was largely due to land acquisition related challenges and the general elections. However, execution remained healthy at 10,855 km in FY2019; around 10% higher than FY2018. The execution target for FY2020 has been set at 11,000 km.聽 聽聽

There has been a lot of debate in recent times about the need for the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to focus on asset monetisation and tap alternate funding avenues viz. toll-operate-transfer (TOT) and infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs) given the huge funding requirement for the ongoing Bharatmala Pariyojana programme. ICRA, in its earlier observation on this subject, has already highlighted the importance of speeding up the TOT awards and other fund-raising initiatives to meet the large funding requirements of the ambitious programme. However, the progress on both these fronts has been slow till date. To add to this, the share of the build-operate-transfer (BOT) (Toll) projects in the overall awards has declined sharply (being made primarily through the EPC/hybrid annuity mode); thereby increasing the financial burden on the NHAI. To overcome this, the NHAI may revert to the BOT (Toll) mode of project awarding. According to ICRA, the risk-sharing is not balanced enough, giving rise to the need to devise a new one.Elaborating on why BOT (Toll) model may not have many takers in its current form, Mr. Rajeshwar Burla, VP & Associate Head, Corporate Ratings, ICRA said, 鈥淩isk averseness of road developers has increased over the last few years. Even today, many developers鈥� balance sheets cannot support huge equity investments towards BOT projects. Further, the transportation sector is undergoing transformational change with alternate modes viz. dedicated freight corridor and inland waterways which would result in a modal shift from road to these modes over the medium to long term. In addition, the road network itself is undergoing significant changes with some of the economic corridors under Bharatmala competing with few existing stretches. Overall, these factors would make the traffic forecasting extremely challenging. Therefore, BOT (Toll) model in its current form may not have many takers. Achieving financial closure also would be a challenge given these uncertainties.鈥滻n the past, what made NHAI shift away from BOT (Toll) to BOT (HAM)? With stressed balance sheets many developers shied away from BOT (Toll) projects. Until FY2014, the mode of project award was determined based on the waterfall mechanism that explored BOT (Toll) first followed by BOT (HAM) and then EPC depending on the traffic density along the project stretch. This process slowed down the awards due to weak private sector participation. Thus, in the absence of private sector participation, shifting to EPC mode and restarting the award process was time consuming which was primary reason for low awards in FY2013 and FY2014. This process was subsequently scrapped, the committee headed by Secretary of Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) now decides on the mode (BOT/EPC) of project awards. One of the reasons why BOT (HAM) was successful in attracting private sector participation was due to low upfront equity requirements when compared to conventional BOT projects.On increasing financial burden for NHAI, compliance to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR) has led to increase in compensation by four times the market value in rural areas and twice the market value in urban areas. This in turn has led to a steep increase in land acquisition cost to upwards of Rs. 2.50 crore per hectare currently (as against Rs. 0.90 crore per hectare in FY2014). Land acquisition cost alone accounts for more than 30% of the total expenses of NHAI. Further, with around 90-92% of the awards over last few years through engineering procurement and construction (EPC, wherein NHAI has to fund 100% upfront) and BOT (HAM, wherein NHAI has to fund 40% upfront and remaining 60% over a period of 15 years) modes, the financial burden on NHAI has continued to remain high. The total debt for NHAI has increased by more than 2.4 times to Rs.1.79 lakh crore as on March 31, 2019 from Rs. 75,385 crore as on March 31, 2017.In this context, NHAI is left with two options 鈥� a) to go slow on project awards or b) increase the mix of BOT (Toll) awards. Given the ambitious targets of Bharatmala programme, NHAI will be required to increase the mix of BOT (Toll) awards.Mr. Burla added, 鈥淭he risk sharing is not balanced in the current BOT (Toll) model. Therefore, it is time to devise a new model on the lines of BOT (HAM) to reduce the upfront equity contribution for private developers to an extent. Also, the new model should have provision to re-negotiate contracts to protect the returns of developers in case of lower-than-anticipated traffic performance especially given the challenges in traffic forecasting currently on account of likely shift to other competing modes.鈥漁n NH awards and execution, awards were at a five-year low in FY2019 at 5,493 km (68% lower than 17,055 km awarded in FY2018) as against the target of 20,000 km for MoRTH. This was largely due to land acquisition related challenges and the general elections. However, execution remained healthy at 10,855 km in FY2019; around 10% higher than FY2018. The execution target for FY2020 has been set at 11,000 km.聽 聽聽

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Dassault To Build Falcon Jets In India With Reliance

Reliance Infrastructure Ltd鈥檚 subsidiary, Reliance Aerostructure, has signed an agreement with France鈥檚 Dassault Aviation to manufacture Falcon 2000 business jets in India, with the first batch expected to roll out from its Nagpur facility by 2028. This marks the first time a Falcon aircraft will be entirely built outside France.The announcement sent Reliance Infrastructure shares surging, hitting the 5 per cent upper circuit on the BSE. Anil Ambani, Chairman of Reliance Group, hailed the agreement as a 鈥渟ymbol of India鈥檚 technological and manufacturing strength鈥�, adding that it aims..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

INDEA Lays Foundation for India鈥檚 First Auto Design School

The Indian School for Design of Automobiles (INDEA), the country鈥檚 first institute focused solely on automobile design and management, held its foundation stone ceremony at XLRI Delhi-NCR. The event was graced by Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways, Nitin Gadkari, who virtually unveiled the stone as Chief Guest.INDEA aims to become a premier talent hub, driving innovation in the Indian automotive sector. The school will focus on advanced design, mobility solutions, and sustainable practices, playing a vital role in shaping India鈥檚 transition from a cost-driven to a quality-led a..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Karnataka Launches Global Innovation Hub at Airport City

The Government of Karnataka, in collaboration with Bengaluru Airport City Limited (BACL) and ANSR, has launched a global innovation hub named District I at Bengaluru Airport City's business park. The initiative aims to elevate India鈥檚 innovation ecosystem to a global scale by fostering collaboration among startups, academia, enterprises, and government bodies.District I will serve as a platform for deep-tech entrepreneurship, enterprise innovation, and commercialisation of academic research. It brings together Global Capability Centres (GCCs), IT firms, corporate labs, startups, venture capi..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement