Best strategies to overcome the COVID-19 impact
01 Apr 2020
3 Min Read
Editorial Team
COVID-19 crisis is a bolt from the blue. There is no precedent of this particular
strain of the Coronavirus , and hence, any projections of its impact can at best be treated as intelligent guesses.
This is Part-2 of a series of an article written by Kunal Kumar, Joint Secretary & Mission Director (Smart Cities Mission), Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, on the likely impacts of the Coronavirus on India; the best strategies going forward; and the key focus areas and actions for the short, medium and long terms.
Read more on his article on 鈥楥辞谤辞苍补惫颈谤耻蝉: What have you done to our economy and society?鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥�Key focus areas and actions 鈥� Short term鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥�Key focus areas and actions 鈥� Medium term鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥�Key focus areas and actions 鈥� Long term鈥� here
What鈥檚 the best strategy now?
1. While this may seem to be the right time to undertake structural reforms which may help build long-term resilience to such crises in the future, our prime concern has to the revival of the economy in the present. To the extent possible, we should only focus on the short-term for the moment while trying to ensure that these short-term measures are in alignment with the needed long-term structural changes.
2. It would be vital to quickly seal the chasms that have developed in the supply side of the economy. We have to remember that the demand side shock is ultimately a fallout of the supply side shock and not vice-versa. Instead of relying on traditional methods which propagate increased public spending in asset creation, more fiscal resources should be targeted at directly helping individuals and firms that may have collapsed due to this sudden shock.
3. To begin with, expenditure on certain ongoing schemes of the government that are long term and will not produce any impact on economic revival/job-creation in the near term (current financial year) could be brought down to maintenance mode. A list of such schemes may be drawn by respective ministries and state governments as Category M projects. New schemes of similar kind waiting for government nod may be pursued up to the stage of approval by government; however, deployment of financial resources on such schemes may be done only from the next financial year.
4. Expenditures on both Central and state schemes for infrastructure creation may be continued on the condition that projects to be undertaken from such funds may follow a revised priority which focuses broadly on two things:
a. Priorities on the health-related response
b. Priorities on the economic response.
5. The responses for every sector would have to be classified into short term (two to three months) focused clearly on defeating the onslaught of the pandemic; medium term (three to eight months months) focused on socioeconomic revival; long term (eight months onwards) focusing on pushing ahead on all cylinders based on new emergent realities.
COVID-19 crisis is a bolt from the blue. There is no precedent of this particular strain of the Coronavirus , and hence, any projections of its impact can at best be treated as intelligent guesses.
This is Part-2 of a series of an article written by Kunal Kumar, Joint Secretary & Mission Director (Smart Cities Mission), Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, on the likely impacts of the Coronavirus on India; the best strategies going forward; and the key focus areas and actions for the short, medium and long terms.
Read more on his article on 鈥楥辞谤辞苍补惫颈谤耻蝉: What have you done to our economy and society?鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥楰ey focus areas and actions 鈥� Short term鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥楰ey focus areas and actions 鈥� Medium term鈥� here
Read more on his article on 鈥楰ey focus areas and actions 鈥� Long term鈥� here
What鈥檚 the best strategy now?
1. While this may seem to be the right time to undertake structural reforms which may help build long-term resilience to such crises in the future, our prime concern has to the revival of the economy in the present. To the extent possible, we should only focus on the short-term for the moment while trying to ensure that these short-term measures are in alignment with the needed long-term structural changes.
2. It would be vital to quickly seal the chasms that have developed in the supply side of the economy. We have to remember that the demand side shock is ultimately a fallout of the supply side shock and not vice-versa. Instead of relying on traditional methods which propagate increased public spending in asset creation, more fiscal resources should be targeted at directly helping individuals and firms that may have collapsed due to this sudden shock.
3. To begin with, expenditure on certain ongoing schemes of the government that are long term and will not produce any impact on economic revival/job-creation in the near term (current financial year) could be brought down to maintenance mode. A list of such schemes may be drawn by respective ministries and state governments as Category M projects. New schemes of similar kind waiting for government nod may be pursued up to the stage of approval by government; however, deployment of financial resources on such schemes may be done only from the next financial year.
4. Expenditures on both Central and state schemes for infrastructure creation may be continued on the condition that projects to be undertaken from such funds may follow a revised priority which focuses broadly on two things:
a. Priorities on the health-related response
b. Priorities on the economic response.
5. The responses for every sector would have to be classified into short term (two to three months) focused clearly on defeating the onslaught of the pandemic; medium term (three to eight months months) focused on socioeconomic revival; long term (eight months onwards) focusing on pushing ahead on all cylinders based on new emergent realities.
Next Story
MoHUA Plans New Role for Smart City SPVs
In a significant policy move, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) has issued an advisory encouraging the continued use and repurposing of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) formed under the Smart Cities Mission (SCM). This marks a step toward sustaining urban transformation by leveraging institutional capabilities and infrastructure developed over the past decade.Initiated in 2015, the Smart Cities Mission introduced a new era of urban planning in India, with each of the 100 selected cities forming SPVs under the Companies Act, 2013. These entities, jointly owned by state government..
Next Story
ADB Approves $110 Million Loan to Boost Skills in Gujarat
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has approved a USD 109.97 million (Rs 9.27 billion) results-based loan to support Gujarat鈥檚 efforts to become a global industrial hub by developing a future-ready, skilled workforce.The funding will back the Gujarat skills development programme, led by the Department of Labour, Skill Development and Employment in collaboration with Kaushalya: The Skill University (KSU). The initiative aims to equip the workforce with advanced, industry-aligned skills to meet rising employment demand in high-growth sectors.According to ADB, the programme seeks to strengthen in..
Next Story
SDAL Tests Rudrastra UAV and Bhargavastra Defence System
Solar Defence and Aerospace Limited (SDAL) has successfully completed a key flight test of its indigenous Hybrid VTOL UAV Rudrastra at the Pokharan Firing Range, aligning with Indian Army performance benchmarks for mission adaptability, high endurance, precision engagement, and vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) capability.The trial marks a notable achievement in India鈥檚 Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative, underscoring advancements in home-grown military technology. The Rudrastra UAV demonstrated a mission radius exceeding 50 km with uninterrupted video relay, a total operational range of over..